Mobile testing is a process of identifying app bugs and issues that could potentially drive users crazy. This is where manual mobile testing comes in to save the day. Despite advancements in automated testing tools, humans are still necessary in the testing process because they provide valuable insights and adapt testing strategies to real-world scenarios. That is why we created a detailed guide on performing manual mobile testing. Let's explore further together.
Manual mobile testing is the process of manually testing mobile applications without using automated tools or scripts. It involves testers conducting predefined tests, exploring various application features, and observing their behavior.
Although manual testing is time-consuming and requires a certain level of expertise, its benefits cannot be ignored. Some of the benefits of manual mobile testing include:
QA testers use effective manual testing methods to ensure mobile app functionality across diverse Android and iOS devices. Those methods are:
Here is an overview of some of the key advantages of manual mobile testing.
Here is an overview of some of the key disadvantages of manual mobile testing.
Let's explore each manual mobile testing step thoroughly.
Before starting manual mobile testing, conducting a detailed analysis of relevant data is important. This includes examining user feedback, bug reports, feature requests, and project requirements. By understanding this data, testers gain valuable insights into user expectations, potential pain points, and application improvement areas. Analyzing data helps prioritize testing efforts, identify critical functionalities, and establish testing objectives that align with project goals.
A clear plan is essential to executing manual mobile testing effectively. The plan should include defined objectives, timelines, and levels of effort, identifying the resources required to accomplish each testing phase. Creating a detailed test plan also enables effective communication with stakeholders, team members, and management, ensuring that expectations are set and met.
One of the key aspects of manual mobile testing is defining a detailed click path that covers all functionalities and user workflows within the mobile application. The click path represents the sequence of user interactions and actions required to navigate various screens, access features, and accomplish tasks within the application. By defining click paths, testers can thoroughly test the application's usability, functionality, and user experience across different scenarios. Here are some key elements of the click path:
Testing on multiple devices, operating systems, and network conditions is a key step in validating the application's compatibility, functionality, and performance across diverse user environments. This includes testing on various device types, screen sizes, resolutions, hardware configurations, and operating system versions (e.g., Android and iOS). Testing in different network environments (e.g., 3G, 4G, Wi-Fi) also helps assess the application's behavior under varying connectivity conditions. For this step, you can also consider the following:
Selecting complex use cases and scenarios is important for uncovering potential issues, assessing the application's performance, and validating its functionality under real-world conditions. Complex use cases should cover various functionalities, interactions, and user scenarios, including typical and edge cases. By testing complex scenarios, testers can identify hidden bugs, edge-case scenarios, and usability issues that may not be apparent during standard testing. To understand how to perform complicated test cases, consider this:
In addition to structured test cases, testers should consider ad-hoc and exploratory testing techniques to uncover unexpected issues, explore the application's behavior, and identify usability issues that already performed test cases may not cover. Ad-hoc testing involves spontaneous testing without predefined scripts or test cases, allowing testers to explore the application freely and identify potential issues on the fly. Additional ad-hoc and exploratory testing explanation:
After critical issues have been identified and resolved, it is recommended that the entire app should be retested to ensure that all issues have been resolved. Retesting confirms that the previous bugs have been resolved and guarantees that the app is fully functional and meets user expectations. This final phase ensures end-users have a good experience and allows for necessary last-minute changes.
Documenting testing results is important for tracking testing progress, communicating findings, and providing valuable feedback to developers and stakeholders. Testers should maintain detailed test documentation, including:
Detailed documentation helps track testing efforts, identify trends and patterns, and facilitate knowledge transfer among team members. It also serves as a reference for future testing cycles, regression testing, and troubleshooting. Effective documentation ensures transparency, accountability, and traceability throughout the testing process.
With our detailed guide on performing manual mobile testing, you can now be confident in your testing approach and ensure your app's success. Always tailor testing strategies to meet your app's specific needs and document results thoroughly to establish a transparent view of the app's health.
Global App Testing provides a solution for manual mobile testing by offering a network of skilled testers and coverage across various mobile devices. Our platform and detailed reporting streamline bug identification and resolution, making Global App Testing stand out for its unique benefits in manual mobile testing. Here are some additional features that Global App Testing can provide:
Efficient and integrated platform:
Rapid and reliable service:
Global user feedback:
Product assurance:
Additional resources:
Are you keen to explore further? Take the next step and sign up now to arrange a quick call today!
QA vs. Software testing - What's the difference?
11 Mobile testing trends you need to know about
Automated testing vs Manual testing - What's the difference?