Your team has just finished developing a mobile app and is ready to take it to market. You're confident your product has the highest usability, functionality, security, and performance standards. There's no need for testing, right? Not quite. Software testing is necessary to ensure the quality and security of your products.
There are two kinds of testing: manual and automated. Manual testing involves a team running tests to catch any errors, while automated testing uses algorithms. With the increase in the scale and scope of testing in DevOps, the need for automated testing is greater than ever.
Test automation refers to the process of conducting tests on a software application using specialized testing software rather than performing them manually. This practice enables the automatic execution of test scripts, thereby streamlining the testing process. The primary advantage of automated testing is the significant time and resource savings, enhancing the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of software quality assessment.
While there are undoubtedly some limitations to automated testing, there's no doubt that it's becoming a necessity. Also, with the progression of AI, the power and scope of automated testing tools are growing exponentially.
Here’s why QA professionals opt for automated testing:
Automated testing, while efficient, faces challenges in achieving 100% effectiveness. The fundamental limitation lies in its scope - automated tests can only assess what they are programmed to check. They miss bugs that fall outside these predefined parameters.
Consider the example of a self-checkout machine at a supermarket. It speeds up the checkout process until it encounters a situation requiring human judgment, like verifying a customer's age for alcohol purchases. Here, the machine's efficiency is compromised. Moreover, setting up and maintaining automated testing systems demands substantial time and financial resources. A common misconception is that automation completely replaces human involvement.
However, who is behind the creation of these test cases or scripts? Human input is essential in automated testing, underscoring the need for an integrated approach in any software testing strategy.
In-house developers and testers may not always design the most effective test cases, especially for less common or more complex application areas. These areas are often more challenging to automate. For instance, personal interaction with an application in its intended geographical location can provide insights that automated tests cannot.
Additionally, repetitive test cases can lose their effectiveness over time. Each update or fix to your application could introduce new bugs. Automated test cases can quickly become obsolete without continuous human oversight and updates. By understanding these limitations, we can better integrate human creativity and insight with the efficiency of automation for more robust software testing.
The testing process in software development is generally structured into three main levels:
Software testing can be placed into two major categories: Black Box and White Box Testing. The two boil down to differences in the test environment. You'll use a different strategy depending on what test data you'd like to execute:
Suppose you were unfamiliar with the broad categories of White and Black Box Testing. In that case, you might be more accustomed to hearing about specific examples of software testing. Good app testing frameworks incorporate most (if not all) of these examples. Whether you're developing a mobile or web application, each has a place in your methodology.
Unit Testing is critical in ensuring the functionality of individual code components. This is true regardless of the programming language used, whether Python, Java, or others. The core idea is to validate whether the smallest, isolated parts of your code - often functions, methods, properties, or subroutines - are working correctly.
Key points:
Now that all the individual parts work, you need to see if your system functions based on your requirements and specifications. Functional Testing ensures that your application operates as it's meant to based on specifications and requirements. Functional testing employs Black Box Testing techniques, so it is executed without the tester's knowledge of the internal system logic.
Key aspects:
While it's harder to automate Black Box Testing, automation solutions are available.
There are tools like Selenium IDE and Appium to aid in automation.
Regression Testing is a critical component of a robust testing strategy, mainly when code changes are frequent. This testing method is integral to Continuous Integration (CI), a development practice where teams frequently integrate code into a shared repository.
The primary purpose of Regression Testing is to verify that recent changes or updates in the system have not adversely affected existing features. This involves selecting and running relevant test cases from the test suite that specifically target the modified or affected portions of the code. It's essential to perform Regression Testing whenever there is a code alteration, modification, or update.
A common experience with software or mobile application updates is the introduction of bugs or issues that weren't present before. These can range from minor inconveniences, like a feature becoming unavailable or the application slowing down, to major problems that cause the application to crash.
In some extreme cases, an update can be so problematic that users might need to delete the application. Regression Testing aims to prevent such scenarios by thoroughly testing the product after every update or change, ensuring that new code additions do not disrupt the existing functionalities.
Do you know how much stress your application can handle? This is a vital piece of information to arm yourself with before you put it in your user's hands. Load tests are non-functional software tests where your software is tested under a specified load. It will show you how the software behaves while being put under the stress of multiple users.
The primary objectives of Load Testing are:
A typical user experience that Load Testing aims to prevent is the frustration of accessing a high-traffic website. Many of us have encountered situations where a website loads its home page but then struggles with delayed load times for its features, often leading users to abandon their efforts. Load Testing ensures your application is prepared for high-traffic scenarios, preventing potential user dissatisfaction and abandonment.
Performance Testing evaluates the stability, responsiveness, and speed of your application. You'll never know how your product can perform under a wide range of conditions unless it undergoes some form of performance test. If you don't test for performance, your software may have slow response times or user experiences inconsistent with the operating system. But how do you evaluate app performance? You can do this by using performance metrics or key performance indicators to guide your automation testing framework.
Some of these include:
Now that you know what automated testing is, let's consider how to execute it:
Consider a scenario from your school days: Despite multiple essay reviews, a friend effortlessly spots a glaring error you missed. Why? Your friend, not having the emotional attachment you had to the essay, brought a fresh, objective perspective, often leading to better results. This analogy aptly illustrates why the human touch remains crucial in Quality Assurance (QA).
Manual testers infuse creativity into the testing phase, offering new ideas to developers. They act as unbiased eyes, providing quick, critical feedback. Their role is significant in sanity checks on real mobile devices, which vary significantly. While automated testing has its strengths, it's not foolproof. Manual testing excels in identifying end-user bugs that automated processes, bound by predefined test cases, may overlook.
Exploratory testing brings a unique element to the QA process. Testers navigate the application intuitively, using their experience to unearth real-world end-user bugs. This hands-on approach often uncovers issues that customers are likely to encounter, which might be missed by automated testing.
Identifying distinctive bugs requires a specific mindset and motivation, a forte of professional testers. Crowdsourced testers, driven by both quality and time and incentivized by payments per bug, are also accountable for the quality of their reports.
While manual testing is still a critical component, your team will save time, money, and resources by using automation wherever they can. You will have a more positive and efficient feedback cycle, better test coverage, and more, contributing to getting your product to market on time and under budget.
As automation becomes more prevalent, remember the value of human oversight. Combine automated testing with manual methods like exploratory and functional testing to maintain a high-quality user experience. Involving your team in testing also deepens their understanding of the product.
Developers and in-house testers, deeply invested in the application, might overlook bugs. Outsiders, like GAT, can provide critical, objective insights without such attachments. External testing can be cost-effective and aligns well with agile methodologies, allowing DevOps teams to focus on development while testers offer continuous feedback.
A diverse community of over 90,000 professional testers complements in-house efforts, excelling in uncovering subtle, unique bugs. Crowdsourced testing provides extensive coverage, fast turnaround times, and the ability to view the application from a user's perspective.
You may be wondering, where do I start? If your team lacks the expertise, remember you can always outsource your software testing. Here at Global App Testing, we have testers from all over the world ready to provide you with a comprehensive solution that includes both manual and automated testing. Sign up and schedule a free call today!
5 Cobalt alternatives to consider in 2024
5 Rainforest QA alternatives to consider in 2024
10 Software testing trends you need to know